{"id":2468,"date":"2014-03-28T21:01:16","date_gmt":"2014-03-29T00:01:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/sindespe.org.br\/portal\/?p=2468"},"modified":"2014-03-29T09:55:43","modified_gmt":"2014-03-29T12:55:43","slug":"nota-da-negociacao-proposta-final-e-discutida","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sindpenal.org.br\/portal\/nota-da-negociacao-proposta-final-e-discutida\/","title":{"rendered":"NOTA DA NEGOCIA\u00c7\u00c3O: PROPOSTA FINAL \u00c9 DISCUTIDA"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"IMG_20140328_175833_352\"<\/a><\/p>\n

A batalha foi longa, \u00e1rdua e evolutiva, pela primeira vez o AEVPs puderam sentar a mesa em uma negocia\u00e7\u00e3o, n\u00e3o como figurantes, mas inciando num papel protagonista.<\/p>\n

At\u00e9 hoje em todas as negocia\u00e7\u00f5es o que se observou foi uma categoria sendo amplamente privilegiada enquanto outras ficavam a sombra.<\/p>\n

O desafio do SINDESPE era ousado, seu alvo principal a equipara\u00e7\u00e3o, sempre pedida pelos AEVPs como reconhecimento pela evolu\u00e7\u00e3o da classe, assim como pela efic\u00e1cia do trabalho.<\/p>\n

Em nota o SINDESPE – Sindicato dos Agentes de Escolta e Vigil\u00e2ncia Penitenci\u00e1ria – informa aos seus filiados o resultado da reuni\u00e3o final com o governo.<\/p>\n

Do acordo salarial: O\u00a0 sindespe\u00a0 n\u00e3o\u00a0 esta\u00a0 satisfeito a luta continua e\u00a0 neste\u00a0 momento t\u00ednhamos que\u00a0 encerrar\u00a0 este\u00a0 assunto porque\u00a0 n\u00e3o\u00a0 haveria mais\u00a0 tempo para\u00a0 o\u00a0 aumento\u00a0 ser\u00a0 enviado a Alesp (assembleia legislativa)\u00a0junto\u00a0 com\u00a0 o\u00a0 do\u00a0 ASP, somos\u00a0 AEVP ou\u00a0 seja\u00a0, seu sal\u00e1rio \u00e9\u00a0 o nosso tamb\u00e9m, sua\u00a0 aposentadoria serve\u00a0 para\u00a0 mim tamb\u00e9m ,\u00a0 enfim tudo que\u00a0 diz\u00a0 respeito\u00a0 ao\u00a0 AEVP. Pedimos equipara\u00e7\u00e3o\u00a0 a todo\u00a0 o momento mas o Governo deu varias\u00a0 desculpas : receio que\u00a0 com\u00a0 equipara\u00e7\u00e3o o\u00a0 concurso\u00a0 de\u00a0 ASP ,passe a n\u00e3o\u00a0 ser\u00a0 interessante aos\u00a0 candidatos, segundo neste\u00a0 instante n\u00e3o\u00a0 tem\u00a0 mais\u00a0 dinheiro para\u00a0 que\u00a0 isto\u00a0 ocorra, terceiro podemos\u00a0 tentar\u00a0 nas\u00a0 negocia\u00e7\u00f5es\u00a0 de\u00a0 2014 .<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"DSCF0996\"<\/a><\/p>\n

A reuni\u00e3o aconteceu na tarde de hoje (28\/mar) \u00e0s 17,30 hrs no Pal\u00e1cio dos Bandeirantes, por\u00a0 tr\u00eas horas\u00a0 exaustivas, na \u00a0sede do governo paulista, onde negociaram como representantes exclusivos dos AEVPs o SINDESPE nas pessoas dos seus dirigentes Antonio Pereira Ramos, William Nunes de Araujo “Nerin” e Dr. Alexandre Alves de Godoy diretor jur\u00eddico, por outro lado representando o governo os secret\u00e1rios de estado Dr\u00ba Lourival Gomes,\u00a0 Dr\u00ba Julio Semeguini e\u00a0 Sr\u00baTadeu Morais (secret\u00e1rio do trabalho)<\/p>\n

Foram quatro mesas de negocia\u00e7\u00f5es at\u00e9 o momento, e um quadro evolutivo nas propostas foi se apresentando, gra\u00e7as ao empenho dos representantes dos AEVPs, que apostaram em um di\u00e1logo direto, sem intermedi\u00e1rios e grupos com interesses espec\u00edficos por\u00e9m alheios aos do AEVP, haja vista a percep\u00e7\u00e3o do SINDESPE de que em separado poderiam alcan\u00e7ar muito mais de que o que fora proposto quando os AEVPs discutiam no coletivo.<\/p>\n

Vejamos as tabelas:<\/p>\n

Na primeira semana caso aceitassem a proposta seria (11\/mar):\u00a0<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

– Reenquadramento entre 0,02% e 4,4%<\/p>\n

– Cria\u00e7\u00e3o de 1 n\u00edvel<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
PROPOSTA APRESENTADA EM 11\/MAR<\/b><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
AGENTE DE ESCOLTA E VIGIL\u00c2NCIA PENITENCI\u00c1RIA<\/b><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n\n

ANTIGO<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

PROPOSTO<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

DIF.SAL<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

PROJETADO<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

ACR\u00c9SCIMO REENQ.<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

N\u00cdVEL<\/b><\/td>\n\n

AEVP 2013<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

ASP 2014<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

ASP% a menos<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

AEVP2014<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

REAIS<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

%<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

I<\/b><\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0 1.797,36<\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0 2.543,28<\/td>\n\n

35,5%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 1.876,85<\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 79,49<\/td>\n\n

4,4%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

II<\/b><\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0 2.075,84<\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0 2.746,74<\/td>\n\n

27,3%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 2.158,38<\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 82,54<\/td>\n\n

4,0%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

III<\/b><\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0 2.396,10<\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0 2.895,50<\/td>\n\n

16,7%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 2.482,13<\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a086,03<\/td>\n\n

3,6%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

IV<\/b><\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0 2.774,10<\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0 3.089,49<\/td>\n\n

8,2%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 2.854,45<\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 80,35<\/td>\n\n

2,9%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

V<\/b><\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0 3.188,36<\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0 3.296,49<\/td>\n\n

3,1%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 3.196,99<\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 8,63<\/td>\n\n

0,27%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

VI<\/b><\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0 3.404,14<\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0 3.517,36<\/td>\n\n

3,3%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 3.404,79<\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 0,65<\/td>\n\n

0,02%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

VII<\/b><\/td>\n<\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0 3.753,02<\/td>\n\n

3,5%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 3.626,10<\/td>\n<\/td>\n******<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0 3.753,02<\/td>\nEm rela\u00e7\u00e3o a nova tabela<\/i><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\ndo ASP<\/i><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

O que resultaria em um maior distanciamento do sal\u00e1rio do ASP<\/p>\n

Na segunda semana (25\/mar)<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

–<\/strong><\/em>\u00a0<\/strong>Reenquadramento de 0,2% a 13,2%<\/p>\n

– Interst\u00edcio de 3 anos para todos os n\u00edveis<\/p>\n

– Acr\u00e9scimo de um n\u00edvel para aposentadoria<\/p>\n

– Participa\u00e7\u00e3o no projeto de bonifica\u00e7\u00e3o anual<\/p>\n

A tabela ficaria assim:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
PROPOSTA APRESENTADA EM 25\/MAR<\/b><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
AGENTE DE ESCOLTA E VIGIL\u00c2NCIA PENITENCI\u00c1RIA<\/b><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n\n

ANTIGO<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

PROPOSTO<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

DIF.SAL<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

PROJETADO<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

ACR\u00c9SCIMO REENQ.<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

N\u00cdVEL<\/b><\/td>\n\n

AEVP 2013<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

ASP 2014<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

ASP% a menos<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

AEVP2014<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

REAIS<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

%<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

I<\/b><\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0 1.797,36<\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0 2.543,28<\/td>\n\n

25,0%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 2.034,62<\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0237,26<\/td>\n\n

13,2%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

II<\/b><\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0 2.075,84<\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0 2.746,74<\/td>\n\n

20,5%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 2.278,78<\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 202,94<\/td>\n\n

9,8%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

III<\/b><\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0 2.396,10<\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0 2.895,50<\/td>\n\n

13,4%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 2.552,23<\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 156,13<\/td>\n\n

6,5%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

IV<\/b><\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0 2.774,10<\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0 3.089,49<\/td>\n\n

8,1%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 2.858,50<\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 84,40<\/td>\n\n

3,0%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

V<\/b><\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0 3.188,36<\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0 3.296,49<\/td>\n\n

3,0%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 3.201,52<\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 13,16<\/td>\n\n

0,41%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

VI<\/b><\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0 3.404,14<\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0 3.517,36<\/td>\n\n

3,2%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 3.409,62<\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 5,48<\/td>\n\n

0,16%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

VII<\/b><\/td>\n<\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0 3.753,02<\/td>\n\n

3,4%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 3.631,24<\/td>\n<\/td>\n******<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0 3.753,02<\/td>\nEm rela\u00e7\u00e3o a nova tabela<\/i><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\ndo ASP<\/i><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Ligeira diminui\u00e7\u00e3o na diferen\u00e7a entre ASP x AEVP<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

A proposta atual (28\/mar)<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

– Reenquadramento de 2,2% a 18%<\/p>\n

– Interst\u00edcio de 3 anos para todos os n\u00edveis<\/p>\n

– Acr\u00e9scimo de um n\u00edvel para aposentadoria<\/p>\n

– Participa\u00e7\u00e3o no projeto de bonifica\u00e7\u00e3o anual<\/p>\n

– Promo\u00e7\u00e3o de \u00a020% para 30% dos servidores<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
PROPOSTA APRESENTADA EM 28\/mar<\/b><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
AGENTE DE ESCOLTA E VIGIL\u00c2NCIA PENITENCI\u00c1RIA<\/b><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n\n

ANTIGO<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

PROPOSTO<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

DIF.SAL<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

PROJETADO<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

ACR\u00c9SCIMO REENQ.<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

N\u00cdVEL<\/b><\/td>\n\n

AEVP 2013<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

ASP 2014<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

ASP% a menos<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

AEVP2014<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

REAIS<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

%<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

I<\/b><\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0 1.797,36<\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0 2.543,28<\/td>\n\n

19,9%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 2.120,88<\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0323,52<\/td>\n\n

18,0%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

II<\/b><\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0 2.075,84<\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0 2.746,74<\/td>\n\n

16,1%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 2.366,46<\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 290,62<\/td>\n\n

14,0%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

III<\/b><\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0 2.396,10<\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0 2.895,50<\/td>\n\n

9,9%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 2.635,71<\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 239,61<\/td>\n\n

10,0%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

IV<\/b><\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0 2.774,10<\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0 3.089,49<\/td>\n\n

5,2%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 2.936,19<\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 162,09<\/td>\n\n

5,8%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

V<\/b><\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0 3.188,36<\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0 3.296,49<\/td>\n\n

1,0%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 3.264,88<\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 76,52<\/td>\n\n

2,40%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

VI<\/b><\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0 3.404,14<\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0 3.517,36<\/td>\n\n

1,1%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 3.479,03<\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 74,89<\/td>\n\n

2,20%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

VII<\/b><\/td>\n<\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0 3.753,02<\/td>\n\n

3,4%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 3.631,24<\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 –<\/td>\n******<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\n\u00a0R$\u00a0\u00a0 3.753,02<\/td>\nEm rela\u00e7\u00e3o a nova tabela<\/i><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\ndo ASP<\/i><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

N\u00e3o foi poss\u00edvel equiparar toda a tabela, mas ap\u00f3s semanas desgastantes de negocia\u00e7\u00f5es um salto foi dado.<\/p>\n

Maiores detalhes sobre a negocia\u00e7\u00e3o e tabela a qualquer momento.<\/p>\n

Estamos levando a tabela nova a base para aprecia\u00e7\u00e3o.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Clique no link abaixo e baixe a tabela evolutiva das negocia\u00e7\u00f5es com a tabela final.<\/p>\n

EVOLU\u00c7\u00c3O DAS PROPOSTAS AEVP 2014<\/a><\/p>\n

Clik abaixo tabela oficial\u00a0 que\u00a0 ir\u00e1 \u00a0para\u00a0 Assembl\u00e9ia<\/p>\n

TABELA OFICIAL DA PROPOSTA FINAL<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

A batalha foi longa, \u00e1rdua e evolutiva, pela primeira vez o AEVPs puderam sentar a mesa em uma negocia\u00e7\u00e3o, n\u00e3o como figurantes, mas inciando num papel protagonista. At\u00e9 hoje em todas as negocia\u00e7\u00f5es o que se observou foi uma categoria sendo amplamente privilegiada enquanto outras ficavam a sombra. O desafio do SINDESPE era ousado, seu alvo principal a equipara\u00e7\u00e3o, sempre pedida pelos AEVPs como reconhecimento pela evolu\u00e7\u00e3o da classe, assim…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_joinchat":[]},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"views":4098,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sindpenal.org.br\/portal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2468"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sindpenal.org.br\/portal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sindpenal.org.br\/portal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sindpenal.org.br\/portal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sindpenal.org.br\/portal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2468"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/sindpenal.org.br\/portal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2468\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2498,"href":"https:\/\/sindpenal.org.br\/portal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2468\/revisions\/2498"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sindpenal.org.br\/portal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2468"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sindpenal.org.br\/portal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2468"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sindpenal.org.br\/portal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2468"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}